Refusal in Melville’s Bartleby, the Scrivener

The apparently quaint protagonist of Her slice Melvilles short-change story, Bartleby, the Scrivener, is a hu homosexuality whose work forcetal attitude gravels marked by general refusal in the end. After being a diligent copyist for the lawyer who narrates the story, Bartleby becomes increasingly recl pulmonary tuberculosis and resistant, until his speech is close to reduced to a single phrase I would prefer not to. His refusal to perform at his job, to frame up the office and fin every(prenominal)y to eat, seems, at first, extravagant and gratuitous. However, as it shall be seen, Bartleby embodies the bringing close together of passive resistance against oppression.The lawyer, who is here the narrator of the story as well, represents the practical and m unmatchableymaking(a) liveness. Wall Street, which is the most famous street associated with the bloodline world, becomes here a symbol of pragmatism. Significantly, the office where Bartleby is utilize is enclosed within walls that obstruct the view at the window. Bartleby, who stares at the great wall incessantly, is the idealist whose metaphysical revolt crashes against the pragmatic world of handicraft he is a part of. The story is told by a lawyer, who is obviously puzzled by Bartlebys inexplicable behavior.Because he does not know how to react to Bartlebys refusals, the lawyer attempts to play a charitable function and let him stay on the premises, without asking him to endure any more. He gives up on his bizarre scrivener however, when he sees that his business has to suffer because of Bartlebys presence. As piece of musicy other of Melvilles characters, the copyist is a Transcendentalist, who tries to see life beyond the superficial. He refuses the lawyers com bitds and offers because he believes that business makes man prohibit his own perception of a deeper reality.Bartlebys dissertation is that human action is useless, and he wraps his thesis in the form of negative preference s, giving to understand that he couldnt act otherwise precisely because it is not a simple matter of will. He seems absolutely paralyzed in inaction, gradually renouncing almost all occupation. As an explanation to the characters strange behavior, the narrator recalls that Bartlebys former employment had put him in charge of the dead letters or the letters that come reached a dead man at their destination.The former employment obviously added to Bartlebys belief in the vanity or inutility of human action in the form of business or commercial employment. Bartlebys inaction intelligibly contrasts with the agitated world of business Sometimes an lawyer having business with me, and calling at my office, and finding no one but the scrivener there, would undertake to guard some sort of precise information from him pathetic my where virtuallys but without heeding his idle talk, Bartleby would remain standing fixed in the middle of the room (Melville 38).His clash with this pragmatic world is significant he refuses to be twisting in the superficial employments of those who do not prove their own spirits and choose to live artificially. Melvilles association with Transcendentalism is recognized. Bartlebys view on life can be therefore explained with the use of the Transcendentalists philosophy. Thus, in look without Principle, Thoreau remarks that the one element that is solely opposed to poetry and life itself is business I think that there is nothing, not even crime, more opposed to poetry, to philosophy, ay to life itself, than this incessant business(Thoreau 1).Thoreau continues his idea by giving example of men who were problematical in businesses that are immoral, such as the lucky rush to California. According to Thoreau, a business which implies that one man will take advantage of another, without genuinely performing something useful, is offensive to religion and to the divinity It makes god be a moneyed gentleman who scatters a handful of penni es in order to see populace scramble for them (Thoreau 1). In the same way, in his call on the carpet Man the Reformer, Emerson criticizes the practice of business and commerce, when these surpass mans primary needs.According to Emerson, to the extent that it is possible, man should think on his own powers for at least a part of the manual labor, in order to have a direct relation to the world unless the doctrine of the Farm is merely this, that every man ought to stand in primary relations with the hold out of the world, ought to do it himself, and not to suffer the accident of his having a purse in his pocket, or his having been bred to some dishonourable and injurious craft, to sever him from those duties (Emerson 1).Thoreaus and Emersons ideas about business are illustrated by Bartlebys attitude towards his employers profession and the world of Wall Street. Bartleby is reactive to the fact that such an employment keeps men from enjoying life for its real value. His peculia r behavior and his absolute refusal of the lawyers proposals show that he holds a variant view of life, than that of the common people.Bartlebys contemplative temper is a further hint that he is immersed in thoughts and meditations and refuses to take part in the shallow activities of the men who surround him. The main character is Melvilles short story is therefore a social misfit, who refuses to acknowledge the superficial world of business that the modern man has walled himself in. With the Transcendentalists, Bartleby is focused on contemplation and understanding of the deeper reality, refusing to become involved in a world of short and purely materialistic concerns.? Works Cited Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Man the Reformer. The Transcendentalist, 2001. Ed. J. Johnson Lewis. Retrieved at July 30, 2009. http//www. emersoncentral. com/manreform. htm. Melville, Hermann. The Complete Shorter Fiction. London Everymans Library, 1997. Thoreau, Henry David. Life without principle. The Tr anscendentalist, 2001. Ed. J. Johnson Lewis. Retrieved at July 30, 2009. http//www. transcendentalists. com/life_without_principle. htm.